Sat 20
May 2006
Did the Bonus Contributers Read The Irresistible Offer?
Posted under Marketing Message, copy writing
1,713 Views | Print This Post | EMail This Post
An interesting thread started at the MJ forums yesterday:
“Great Formula” freebie contributors should have read “Irresistable Offer”
First of all it is a fantastic list of surprise bonuses that you can have when you order Mark’s new book “The Great Formula” and I look forward to reading and listening to some of the products while I wait for Amazon to deliver the new book.
But… there are some lessons to be learned just by scrolling through and signing up for the list of offerings.
I think SOME of the people that contributed freebies as part of the promotion should have read Mark’s last book about “Irresistible Offers”.
Here is a chance to gain access to lots of new prospects and some of these contributors are not putting the best foot forward.
Here are some things I noticed:
- Links that didn’t work…
- Boring text that doesn’t “sell” their “free” offer…
- Confusing hoops to jump through to get access to the freebie (and I’m not talking about collecting emails)…
- Outdated pictures…
- No benefit laden headline…
- Only a couple of contributors put me in front of an offer after I subscribed to their ezine…
…and some of these people are trying to present themselves as marketing experts!
I guess the thing that stuck out to me the most was that the contributors that were offering something “specific” and presented themselves as a “specific” type of expert came across better than the others who were trying to be all things to all people ie. generic marketing expert or generic success expert.
I realize that I’m probably going to get flamed for writing all this, but there just seemed to be a great divide between those that ‘get it’ and those that don’t.
Does anybody else out there have some ideas how some of the contributors could have done better? (so we can all learn from this.)
Best,
Rob Shanon
I was discussing this with my good friend Valerie Booth last night on skype and she mentioned she had only received 3 signups for her bonus offer since “The Great Formula” was released. It couldn’t have been because the book wasn’t selling well. As you probably know it’s become a #1 best-seller at Amazon today and that doesn’t happen with 3 sales a day…
At this point Valerie’s headline was formulated as follows:
Followed by a down-to-earth message about how you could win $150.- worth of delicious chocolate mints that are individually wrapped and imprinted with your company logo or message.
Why was nobody inclined to sign up for this bonus?
I personally find that being exposed to 88+ bonuses is a rather stressful experience. Here you are offered a chance to get 12K of products and services all for nothing. You know you don’t want to miss this chance. Yet you also know there is no way you’ll be able to make use of everything which is offered…
Basically you are dealing with information overload here and to save you time and more stress you need to make quick decisions about what’s valuable for you. So most people will most likely skim through the headlines to make these decisions.
Only when the headline triggers a first interest you will continue to read the bonus description and its benefits to you. And only after that you’ll make a final decision about whether or not the bonus is worth your time to sign up for it.
Val’s headline was definitely not getting the desired results…
So what was the hidden message in this headline?
- You’d have to enter a sweepstake, meaning that there is only a small chance of being rewarded for your effort…
- This offer is about gourmet food, while “The Great Formula” is targeted at business people…
Yes, I know… The bonus is actually not about gourmet food at all. It’s very much targeted at entrepreneurs instead. However, you only find out that this is the case after you get passed the headline…
So Val made some significant changes. And personally I find that her new headline is now actually the best of them all!
Check it out for yourself:
http://patriciarits.thegreatformula.com
I would be very surprised if she isn’t seeing her signup rates increase manyfold…
Let me know if you agree with me!
Patricia Ritsema van Eck
P.S.
If you don’t want to take your chances at winning the sweepstake, here’s where you can order these sinfully delicious mints yourself:
Tag: bonuses, marketing message, marketing strategy
Wp Datafeeds
Targetedwebsystems
Kids Math Quiz
Simpleology Fans
The 60-Day Experiment
Mypcworksok
|
4 Responses to “ Did the Bonus Contributers Read The Irresistible Offer? ”
Comments:
Leave a Reply
Trackbacks & Pingbacks:
-
Trackback from Valerie Booth's Blog
May 23rd, 2006 at 5:50 pmLet’s USE What We Learned in “The Irresistible Offer”…
Maybe the straight-forward world of aviation has taken over my ad copy, which is starting to read more like the Pilot / Controller Glossary in the latest FAR/AIM.
……
-
Pingback from patriciaritsemavaneck.name » The Freebie Orgie Challenge
July 2nd, 2006 at 6:30 am[…] Read on… […]












May 20th, 2006 at 2:39 pm
I agree with your major premise. I have contributed bonuses to several of these promos, and it’s always interesting to see how poor some of the offerings are:
-broken links
-missing or distorted graphics
-bonuses that 10,000 people already have rights to distribute
I think I do well with these because I offer an original report that nobody else has the rights to, and it has no affiliate links or offers in it.
I also do NOT have an offer after people sign up. Call me contrarian, but I think when people are in the mood to download bonuses, they aren’t expecting or interested in buying something right now. So by NOT trying to sell them something, I set myself apart. After all, my goal is just to get them to download the report and subscribe to my newsletter, not to extract cash from them before I have given them any information.
I don’t think great marketing means trying to sell something at every possible opportunity.
Chris Lockwood
May 20th, 2006 at 4:00 pm
I agree with you. I spent a good part of the day yesterday going through the offers and ‘freebies’.
Some were very good.
Some were ‘ok -but’.
Some were terrible.
Some were broken (several types of broken including non-existing pages).
Some were confusing (I have been on the Internet since before there were browsers and I know what to do when there is a problem - many people - perhaps even most do not and just gave up.
I do not know if all of the people had sufficient time to build their offer sites, but as some were very good (even those in which I had no direct interest) my guess is that some just do not have the skillset required.
I have been doing Internet marketing as an affiliate with TNI and Gano for a while (TNI 4 years and I was among the first 200 with Gano USA - Canada). I think that some people did it in a rush-rush fashion and it shows. There were however enough people with obvious quality and knowledge to make it worthwhile. Even the ones which had some problem were somewhat informative (in the sense of what NOT to do).
There is no way I will be able to spend the time reading all of the information I did download or watch all of the videos or listen to all of the audio. I did it for the original book and consider the rest a ‘bonus’. I do not yet know if the ‘bonus’ was worth my time. There are probably some pieces I will be able to use and some I will toss as garbage, but it was an interesting exercise.
Bob Firestone